Topic 1.10
Rational Functions and Holes
6 MIN READ7 IDEAS23 PROBLEMS14 flashcards
Read this first
30 sec
- 01
Compare the power of a shared factor in the numerator vs. the denominator.
Numerator's power denominator's power → the denominator's copies all cancel → hole.
Denominator's power higher → a copy remains underneath → vertical asymptote.
Careful with the first case: even when the numerator has more copies, the point is still a hole, never a zero. The original denominator is there, so the function is undefined at that input — and an undefined input cannot be a zero.
Recap: What Is a Hole?
A hole happens when a factor cancels completely between the numerator and denominator. The function is undefined at that single x-value, but everywhere else nearby, it behaves exactly like the simplified version.
The Limit Notation for a Hole
In 1.9, you saw that a vertical asymptote has one-sided limits that go to . A hole is completely different — the two-sided limit actually EXISTS and is a finite number — it's just that the function itself is undefined there.
CONCEPT
Comparing a Hole to a Vertical Asymptote
At a vertical asymptote: (the limit is infinite, or the two sides don't even match).
At a hole: , some ordinary finite number — even though itself is undefined.
Quick check
. What is , and is defined?
Step-by-Step: Finding a Hole with Limit Notation
Worked example
For , find the domain, zero, and hole — and express the hole using limit notation.
- 01
Factor the numerator:
- 02
The factor cancels completely:
- 03
Domain: all reals except . Zero (from the simplified form): .
- 04
Express the hole using limit notation — plug into the SIMPLIFIED expression:
- 05
The hole is at . Even though is undefined, the LIMIT as approaches 2 is a perfectly ordinary number: 5.
The two-sided limit exists and equals 5 — that's exactly where the open circle sits.
A Trickier Case: A Squared Factor That Fully Cancels
In 1.9, you saw a case where a repeated factor only PARTIALLY canceled, leaving a genuine vertical asymptote. Here's the contrast: what if the SAME power appears in both the numerator and denominator?
Worked example
For , find the domain, hole, and vertical asymptote.
- 01
The factor appears with the EXACT SAME power in both the numerator and denominator — it cancels completely, leaving nothing behind:
- 02
Since nothing is left over from , is a HOLE, not a vertical asymptote. Domain: all reals except and .
- 03
Find the hole's location using limit notation:
- 04
Hole at . The remaining factor in the denominator gives a genuine vertical asymptote at .
A squared factor CAN still produce a hole — the deciding factor is whether it fully cancels, not whether it's squared.
KEY RULE
Compare the POWER of a shared factor in the numerator vs. the denominator.
Numerator's power denominator's power → the denominator's copies all cancel → HOLE.
Denominator's power higher → a copy remains underneath → VERTICAL ASYMPTOTE.
Careful with the first case: even when the numerator has MORE copies, the point is still a hole, never a zero. The ORIGINAL denominator is there, so the function is undefined at that input — and an undefined input cannot be a zero.
Quick check
. Hole or asymptote at , and at what height?
Domain Notation with Holes and Asymptotes Together
When writing domain in interval notation, both holes AND vertical asymptotes get excluded — they just look identical in interval notation, even though they mean different things graphically.
CONCEPT
Example: Writing the Domain for Above
has a hole at and a vertical asymptote at .
Domain in interval notation: ∪ ∪
Notice the interval notation alone can't tell you which excluded point is a hole and which is an asymptote — you have to say that separately.
COMMON MISTAKE
A hole is NOT visible in interval notation any differently than a vertical asymptote — always state which is which separately, in words.
Don't forget to exclude the hole's x-value from the domain, even though the function 'looks fine' there on a simplified expression — the ORIGINAL function was undefined there.
Practice Problems
Worked example
Problem 1. For , find the hole using limit notation.
- 01
Factor: . The factor cancels, leaving (x≠−2).
- 02
. Hole at .
Worked example
Problem 2. Does have a hole or an asymptote at ? At ?
- 01
At : numerator has power , denominator has power . The denominator's single copy cancels and one copy is left over in the NUMERATOR.
That leftover makes the SIMPLIFIED expression equal at — but the ORIGINAL denominator is there too, so is undefined. An undefined input is not a zero.
So is a HOLE, and it sits at — on the -axis, which is what makes it easy to mistake for a zero.
- 02
At : numerator has power 1, denominator has power 2 — the denominator's power is HIGHER, so one copy remains in the denominator after canceling. This makes a VERTICAL ASYMPTOTE.
Key Takeaways
- A hole occurs where a factor cancels completely — the two-sided limit exists (), even though is undefined.
- Contrast with a vertical asymptote: there, the limit is infinite (), not a finite number.
- Compare powers of a shared factor: numerator's power ≥ denominator's → HOLE; denominator higher → vertical asymptote.
- A hole can sit ON the -axis. If the numerator had more copies, the hole lands at — it still is not a zero, because the original function is undefined there.
- In interval notation, holes and vertical asymptotes both get excluded — but they aren't visually distinguishable in that notation, so always clarify separately.
Common slips
A hole is not visible in interval notation any differently than a vertical asymptote — always state which is which separately, in words.
Don't forget to exclude the hole's x-value from the domain, even though the function 'looks fine' there on a simplified expression — the original function was undefined there.
Lock it in
Try the flashcards
14 cards · Rational functions, Hole or asymptote?
Recap card
One line to re-read the night before.
- 01
Compare the power of a shared factor in the numerator vs. the denominator.
Numerator's power denominator's power → the denominator's copies all cancel → hole.
Denominator's power higher → a copy remains underneath → vertical asymptote.
Careful with the first case: even when the numerator has more copies, the point is still a hole, never a zero. The original denominator is there, so the function is undefined at that input — and an undefined input cannot be a zero.