FiveWay Premium

Unlock every question

1,292 more practice questions, 134 Killer problems, timed mock exams in the 2027 format, and sets built from the skills you miss.

Current accessGuestYou are browsing without an account. Sign in to keep your record.

Free

Always, no account needed to read

  • A 7-question diagnostic and the first 8 practice questions in every topic
  • A worked solution and a note on each wrong choice for those questions
  • Every concept note, in every chapter
  • Your record and My page

Premium

Everything in Free, plus

  • The other 1,292 questions — every chapter, to the end
  • 134 Killer problems, pitched above the exam ceiling
  • Timed mock exams in the 2027 format — 42 questions, 105 minutes
  • Sets built from the skills you keep missing, refilled weekly
  • Analytics — accuracy per skill, time per question, your weak chapters
Unlock early access

Early access is free while we test. No card, no timer. Compare plans

Sign in to FiveWay

Sign in to keep your answers and see which skills to fix.

  • Free to start
  • No password
  • Progress saved on every device

We store your answers and the skills they belong to. Your first name and last initial appear only on the leaderboard and in Community.

Topic 1.10

Rational Functions and Holes

6 MIN READ7 IDEAS23 PROBLEMS14 flashcards

Read this first

30 sec

  1. 01

    Compare the power of a shared factor in the numerator vs. the denominator.

    Numerator's power ≥\ge denominator's power → the denominator's copies all cancel → hole.

    Denominator's power higher → a copy remains underneath → vertical asymptote.

    Careful with the first case: even when the numerator has more copies, the point is still a hole, never a zero. The original denominator is 00 there, so the function is undefined at that input — and an undefined input cannot be a zero.

01

Recap: What Is a Hole?

A hole happens when a factor cancels completely between the numerator and denominator. The function is undefined at that single x-value, but everywhere else nearby, it behaves exactly like the simplified version.

02

The Limit Notation for a Hole

In 1.9, you saw that a vertical asymptote has one-sided limits that go to ±∞\pm \infty. A hole is completely different — the two-sided limit actually EXISTS and is a finite number — it's just that the function itself is undefined there.

CONCEPT

Comparing a Hole to a Vertical Asymptote

At a vertical asymptote: lim(x→a)lim(x \to a) f(x)=±∞f(x) = \pm \infty (the limit is infinite, or the two sides don't even match).

At a hole: lim(x→a)lim(x \to a) f(x)=Lf(x) = L, some ordinary finite number — even though f(a)f(a) itself is undefined.

Quick check

f(x)=x−5x2−25f(x) = \frac{x - 5}{x^{2} - 25}. What is lim⁡x→5f(x)\lim_{x \to 5} f(x), and is f(5)f(5) defined?

03

Step-by-Step: Finding a Hole with Limit Notation

Worked example

For v(x)=(x2+x−6)/(x−2)v(x) = (x^{2} + x - 6) / (x - 2), find the domain, zero, and hole — and express the hole using limit notation.

v(x)=x2+x−6x−2v(x) = \frac{x^2 + x - 6}{x - 2}
  1. 01

    Factor the numerator:

    x2+x−6=(x−2)(x+3)x^2 + x - 6 = (x - 2)(x + 3)
  2. 02

    The factor (x−2)(x-2) cancels completely:

    v(x)=(x−2)(x+3)x−2=x+3(x≠2)v(x) = \frac{(x - 2)(x + 3)}{x - 2} = x + 3 \quad (x \neq 2)
  3. 03

    Domain: all reals except x=2x=2. Zero (from the simplified form): x=−3x=-3.

  4. 04

    Express the hole using limit notation — plug x=2x=2 into the SIMPLIFIED expression:

    lim⁡x→2v(x)=2+3=5\lim_{x \to 2} v(x) = 2 + 3 = 5
  5. 05

    The hole is at (2,5)(2, 5). Even though v(2)v(2) is undefined, the LIMIT as xx approaches 2 is a perfectly ordinary number: 5.

    −7.5 −5.0 −2.5 2.5 5.0 7.5 −4 −2 2 4 6 8 10 12 hole at (2, 5) zero at x = −3 v(x) = (x²+x−6)/(x−2): the Limit Exists Even Though v(2) Doesn't

    The two-sided limit exists and equals 5 — that's exactly where the open circle sits.

04

A Trickier Case: A Squared Factor That Fully Cancels

In 1.9, you saw a case where a repeated factor only PARTIALLY canceled, leaving a genuine vertical asymptote. Here's the contrast: what if the SAME power appears in both the numerator and denominator?

Worked example

For z(x)=[(x+7)(x−3)2]/[(x−3)2(x−5)]z(x) = [(x+7)(x-3)^{2}] / [(x-3)^{2}(x-5)], find the domain, hole, and vertical asymptote.

z(x)=(x+7)(x−3)2(x−3)2(x−5)z(x) = \frac{(x + 7)(x - 3)^2}{(x - 3)^2 (x - 5)}
  1. 01

    The factor (x−3)2(x-3)^{2} appears with the EXACT SAME power in both the numerator and denominator — it cancels completely, leaving nothing behind:

    z(x)=x+7x−5(x≠3)z(x) = \frac{x + 7}{x - 5} \quad (x \neq 3)
  2. 02

    Since nothing is left over from (x−3)(x-3), x=3x=3 is a HOLE, not a vertical asymptote. Domain: all reals except x=3x=3 and x=5x=5.

  3. 03

    Find the hole's location using limit notation:

    lim⁡x→3z(x)=3+73−5=10−2=−5\lim_{x \to 3} z(x) = \frac{3 + 7}{3 - 5} = \frac{10}{-2} = -5
  4. 04

    Hole at (3,−5)(3, -5). The remaining factor (x−5)(x-5) in the denominator gives a genuine vertical asymptote at x=5x=5.

    −7.5 −5.0 −2.5 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 −8 −6 −4 −2 2 4 6 8 VA: x = 5 hole at (3, −5) (fully cancels) z(x): a Squared Factor That FULLY Cancels — Still Just a Hole

    A squared factor CAN still produce a hole — the deciding factor is whether it fully cancels, not whether it's squared.

KEY RULE

Compare the POWER of a shared factor in the numerator vs. the denominator.

Numerator's power ≥\ge denominator's power → the denominator's copies all cancel → HOLE.

Denominator's power higher → a copy remains underneath → VERTICAL ASYMPTOTE.

Careful with the first case: even when the numerator has MORE copies, the point is still a hole, never a zero. The ORIGINAL denominator is 00 there, so the function is undefined at that input — and an undefined input cannot be a zero.

Quick check

q(x)=(x−4)3(x+1)(x−4)2(x+3)q(x) = \frac{(x - 4)^{3}(x + 1)}{(x - 4)^{2}(x + 3)}. Hole or asymptote at x=4x = 4, and at what height?

05

Domain Notation with Holes and Asymptotes Together

When writing domain in interval notation, both holes AND vertical asymptotes get excluded — they just look identical in interval notation, even though they mean different things graphically.

CONCEPT

Example: Writing the Domain for z(x)z(x) Above

z(x)z(x) has a hole at x=3x=3 and a vertical asymptote at x=5x=5.

Domain in interval notation: (−∞,3)(-\infty, 3) ∪ (3,5)(3, 5) ∪ (5,∞)(5, \infty)

Notice the interval notation alone can't tell you which excluded point is a hole and which is an asymptote — you have to say that separately.

COMMON MISTAKE

A hole is NOT visible in interval notation any differently than a vertical asymptote — always state which is which separately, in words.

Don't forget to exclude the hole's x-value from the domain, even though the function 'looks fine' there on a simplified expression — the ORIGINAL function was undefined there.

06

Practice Problems

Worked example

Problem 1. For w(x)=(x2−2x−8)/(x+2)w(x) = (x^{2} - 2x - 8) / (x + 2), find the hole using limit notation.

  1. 01

    Factor: x2−2x−8=(x+2)(x−4)x^{2}-2x-8 = (x+2)(x-4). The factor (x+2)(x+2) cancels, leaving w(x)=x−4w(x) = x-4 (x≠−2).

  2. 02

    lim(x→−2)lim(x \to -2) w(x)=−2−4=−6w(x) = -2-4 = -6. Hole at (−2,−6)(-2, -6).

Worked example

Problem 2. Does m(x)=(x−1)2(x+3)/[(x−1)(x+3)2]m(x) = (x-1)^{2}(x+3) / [(x-1)(x+3)^{2}] have a hole or an asymptote at x=1x=1? At x=−3x=-3?

  1. 01

    At x=1x=1: numerator has power 22, denominator has power 11. The denominator's single copy cancels and one copy is left over in the NUMERATOR.

    That leftover makes the SIMPLIFIED expression equal 00 at x=1x=1 — but the ORIGINAL denominator is 00 there too, so m(1)m(1) is undefined. An undefined input is not a zero.

    So x=1x = 1 is a HOLE, and it sits at (1,0)(1, 0) — on the xx-axis, which is what makes it easy to mistake for a zero.

  2. 02

    At x=−3x=-3: numerator has power 1, denominator has power 2 — the denominator's power is HIGHER, so one copy remains in the denominator after canceling. This makes x=−3x=-3 a VERTICAL ASYMPTOTE.

07

Key Takeaways

  • A hole occurs where a factor cancels completely — the two-sided limit exists (lim(x→a)f(x)=Llim(x \to a) f(x) = L), even though f(a)f(a) is undefined.
  • Contrast with a vertical asymptote: there, the limit is infinite (±∞\pm \infty), not a finite number.
  • Compare powers of a shared factor: numerator's power ≥ denominator's → HOLE; denominator higher → vertical asymptote.
  • A hole can sit ON the xx-axis. If the numerator had more copies, the hole lands at (a,0)(a, 0) — it still is not a zero, because the original function is undefined there.
  • In interval notation, holes and vertical asymptotes both get excluded — but they aren't visually distinguishable in that notation, so always clarify separately.

Common slips

  • A hole is not visible in interval notation any differently than a vertical asymptote — always state which is which separately, in words.

    Don't forget to exclude the hole's x-value from the domain, even though the function 'looks fine' there on a simplified expression — the original function was undefined there.

Lock it in

Try the flashcards

14 cards · Rational functions, Hole or asymptote?

Start

Recap card

One line to re-read the night before.

  1. 01

    Compare the power of a shared factor in the numerator vs. the denominator.

    Numerator's power ≥\ge denominator's power → the denominator's copies all cancel → hole.

    Denominator's power higher → a copy remains underneath → vertical asymptote.

    Careful with the first case: even when the numerator has more copies, the point is still a hole, never a zero. The original denominator is 00 there, so the function is undefined at that input — and an undefined input cannot be a zero.

Premium feature

Unlock Premium

Every question, sets from your misses, mock exams and more.

Current accessFree

  • Every practice question
  • Sets from your misses
  • Mock exams

Free during early access — no card. Your progress stays exactly where it is. Compare plans